Lesson 4.6 — Hybrid Retrieval (Keyword + Vector)
Introduction: The Best of Both Worlds
So far in our journey of building an AI agent, we have focused heavily on semantic search powered by vector embeddings. This approach is incredibly powerful for understanding the meaning and context behind a user's query. However, it is not without its weaknesses. Semantic search can sometimes struggle with queries that contain specific, important keywords, such as product codes, acronyms, or unique names.
On the other hand, traditional keyword search (also known as sparse vector search, with algorithms like BM25) excels at this kind of exact-match retrieval. It is fast, efficient, and highly accurate for queries where specific terms are crucial. However, it lacks the contextual understanding of semantic search.
This is where hybrid retrieval comes in. Hybrid retrieval is a powerful technique that combines the strengths of both keyword search and vector search to create a more comprehensive and robust retrieval system. By merging the results of both methods, we can create a system that is greater than the sum of its parts.
This lesson will explore the principles of hybrid retrieval, how it works, and why it is rapidly becoming the standard for modern, high-performance RAG systems.
Understanding the Two Sides of the Coin
To appreciate the power of hybrid retrieval, it is essential to understand the distinct strengths and weaknesses of its two components.
Core Principle
Matches the exact words in the query.
Understands the meaning and context of the query.
Strengths
- Excellent for specific keywords, product codes, acronyms. - Fast and computationally efficient. - Highly precise for known-item searches.
- Excellent for ambiguous or conversational queries. - Understands synonyms and related concepts. - Discovers relevant information even if the exact keywords are not present.
Weaknesses
- Fails if the exact keywords are not present. - Does not understand synonyms or context. - Can be easily confused by variations in language.
- Can sometimes miss important keywords. - Can be more computationally expensive. - May retrieve conceptually related but factually incorrect information.
As explained by Weaviate, "dense vectors excel at understanding the context of the query, whereas sparse vectors excel at keyword matches" [3].
How Hybrid Retrieval Works: The Fusion Process
Hybrid retrieval works by performing both a keyword search and a vector search in parallel and then intelligently merging the results into a single, ranked list. This merging process is known as fusion.
The most common fusion algorithm is Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF). RRF is a simple yet powerful method that ranks results based on their position in each of the individual search result lists.
The RRF Algorithm
The RRF score for each document is calculated by taking the sum of the reciprocal of its rank in each of the search lists:
RRF Score = (1 / rank_keyword) + (1 / rank_vector)
The documents are then re-ranked based on their combined RRF score. This approach has the elegant property of rewarding documents that appear high up in either list, ensuring that the best results from both search methods are given prominence.
A Practical Example
Let's say we have the query "Tell me about the new 'Orion' feature in the 'Pegasus' software."
Keyword Search might rank documents containing the specific terms "Orion" and "Pegasus" very highly.
Semantic Search might rank documents that discuss "new software capabilities" and "product updates" highly, even if they don't contain the exact keywords.
By using RRF, a document that contains both the specific keywords and is semantically related to the query will receive a high score from both searches and will therefore be ranked at the top of the final list.
The Benefits of Hybrid Retrieval
Adopting a hybrid retrieval strategy offers several significant advantages:
Improved Accuracy: By combining the strengths of both methods, hybrid retrieval is able to find more relevant results for a wider range of queries.
Increased Robustness: The system is less likely to fail completely, as it has two different ways of finding relevant information.
Better Handling of Complex Queries: Hybrid retrieval excels at handling queries that contain a mix of conversational language and specific keywords.
Enhanced User Experience: Users receive more relevant and comprehensive results, leading to a more satisfying and effective interaction with the agent.
Conclusion: A New Standard for Retrieval
Hybrid retrieval represents a significant step forward in the evolution of information retrieval systems. By moving beyond the false dichotomy of keyword vs. semantic search, we can build systems that are more accurate, more resilient, and ultimately more intelligent. For any serious RAG application, hybrid retrieval should be considered the default and most effective approach.
In our final lesson of this module, we will explore the concept of intent drift detection. We will learn how to monitor the performance of our routing system over time and how to detect and adapt to changes in user behavior.
Last updated